W.D. Michigan· 3/30/2001
In Re Hudson
Citations
- 260 B.R. 421
- 2001 Bankr. LEXIS 319
- 2001 WL 357254
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defining the \validity\ of a lien as \the existence or legitimacy of the lien itself\
- “Nothing in the Bankruptcy Code or Rules gives any evidentiary effect whatsoever to a secured creditor's asserted value of collateral_”
- defining “validity” as “having legal strength or force” or “enforceable”(internal quotation marks omitted)
- wherein Judge Gregg held the “extent” of a lien is not synonymous with the value of collateral
- a qualitatively sufficient notice is one that contains all the material substantive and procedural information necessary to apprise a creditor of the debtor’s proposed treatment of the creditor’s claim
- “Validity” means “enforceable” and “priority” is “superiority in rank or position.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: James D. Gregg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- SLW Capital, LLC v. Mansaray-RuffinThird Circuit· 2008-06-24· cited 67×
- Shook v. CBIC (In Re Shook)Ninth Circuit· 2002-05-22· cited 49×
- Official Committe of Unsecured Creditors v. MoellerFifth Circuit· 2015-09-16· cited 49×
- In Re MillspaughD. Idaho· 2003-10-24· cited 28×
- In Re BulsonW.D. Michigan· 2005-05-27· cited 26×
- Camille Hope v. Acorn Financial Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2013-09-26· cited 23×
- In Re DugginsC.D. Illinois· 2001-06-12· cited 23×
- Duplessis v. Valenti (In Re Valenti)Ninth Circuit· 2004-05-11· cited 22×
- In Re BryantE.D. Pennsylvania· 2005-04-19· cited 19×
- In re DumainS.D. New York· 2013-05-08· cited 19×
- In Re McLemoreS.D. Ohio· 2010-03-30· cited 17×
- In Re SmoakS.D. Ohio· 2011-09-28· cited 17×
- In Re BennettW.D. Kentucky· 2004-07-26· cited 14×
- In Re ZimmermanC.D. Illinois· 2001-06-28· cited 13×
- In Re BrooksC.D. Illinois· 2007-06-22· cited 13×
- In Re EulianoD. Massachusetts· 2010-11-29· cited 13×
- Johnson v. Stemple (In Re Stemple)E.D. Virginia· 2007-02-14· cited 12×
- In Re SadalaM.D. Florida· 2003-06-02· cited 10×
- Diamond Power International, Inc. v. Babcock & Wilcox Co. (In Re Babcock & Wilcox Co.)E.D. Louisiana· 2002-02-08· cited 9×
- In Re AdamsN.D. Illinois· 2001-12-04· cited 9×
Cites
49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 10,395×
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 2,898×
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court· 1965-04-26· cited 2,853×
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court· 1798-08-17· cited 1,860×
- Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court· 1992-01-15· cited 1,346×
- Norwest Bank Worthington v. AhlersSupreme Court· 1988-03-07· cited 992×
- Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court· 1938-12-19· cited 890×
- Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. DavenportSupreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 854×
- Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court· 1941-01-13· cited 774×
- United States v. Security Industrial BankSupreme Court· 1982-11-30· cited 686×
- Rake v. WadeSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 431×
- Sanders Confectionery Products, Inc. v. Heller Financial, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1992-08-17· cited 372×
- In the Matter of JAMES WILSON ASSOCIATES, Debtor. Appeals of METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSeventh Circuit· 1992-05-22· cited 330×
- In Re Benjamin Pierce Simmons, Bankrupt. Benjamin Pierce Simmons v. J.T. SavellFifth Circuit· 1985-07-19· cited 288×
- In Re Fred J. Szostek, Denise M. SzostekThird Circuit· 1989-10-12· cited 273×
- United States v. United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co.Supreme Court· 1950-05-29· cited 243×
- Reliable Electric Co., Inc. v. Olson Construction CompanyTenth Circuit· 1984-02-28· cited 203×
- United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Lawrence Douglas Todd, Cross-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1990-12-04· cited 179×
- Cen-Pen Corporation v. Walter E. Hanson Loraine P. HansonFourth Circuit· 1995-06-22· cited 177×
- In the Matter of Phyllis Maxine Pence, Debtor. Appeal of Pacesetter Bank of MontpelierSeventh Circuit· 1990-07-13· cited 135×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.