Skip to main content
C.D. Illinois· 6/22/2007

In Re Brooks

Citations

  • 370 B.R. 194
  • 58 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 357
  • 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 2085
  • 2007 WL 1810491

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “any erosion of the strict enforcement of the claim bar date would be unfair to those creditors who follow the rules and would also tend to ... increase late claim litigation.”
  • “The fact that the … Plan, which does not purport to extend the claim bar date, provides that the [creditor] will have an unsecured deficiency claim, does not change the claim filing rules or relieve the [creditor] of the need to follow them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas L. Perkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.