Stoll v. Gottlieb

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that party may not collaterally attack the jurisdiction of a court when that question already has been decided
• concluding that a determination of subject mat ter jurisdiction in a contested action was res judicata and precluded reexamination
• holding that party may not collaterally attack the jurisdiction of a court when that question already has been decided
• ruling that even if a federal court lacked jurisdiction as to guaranties dealt with in the plan, confirmation order may not be revisited by state court, absent allegation of fraud
• ruling that even if a federal court lacked jurisdiction to extinguish a guaranty in a plan of reorganization, the confirmation order cannot be revisited by state court, absent an allegation of fraud
• holding that a bankruptcy court’s order barred a creditor from bringing ancillary litigation since “[i]t is just as important that there should be a place to end as that there should be a place to begin litigation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).