Skip to main content
· 10/12/1989

In Re Fred J. Szostek, Denise M. Szostek

Citations

  • 886 F.2d 1405
  • 105 B.R. 1405
  • 21 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 889
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 15560
  • 19 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1520
  • 1989 WL 119194

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, as a general rule, the absence of an objection indicates acceptance of a plan’s terms
  • finding that the creditor’s failure to object to the plan constitutes acceptance of its treatment under that plan
  • stating that “after the plan is confirmed the policy favoring the finality of confirmation is stronger than the bankruptcy court's and the trustee's obligations to verify a plan's compliance with the Code”
  • declining to reverse confirmation of chapter 13 plan when appellant failed to object to confirmation order
  • stating that creditors must take an active role in protecting their rights
  • distinguishing a case in which the creditor was not aware of the clause in the plan which limited its rights because it had not been included in the notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mansmann, Nygaard, Aldisert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.