Michigan Court of Appeals· 5/5/2009
In Re AP
Citations
- 770 N.W.2d 403
- 283 Mich. App. 574
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that a period of approximately four months was sufficient to establish a custodial environment with one parent
- finding that a period of approximately four months was sufficient to establish a custodial environment with one parent
- explaining that when the juvenile section decides a custody matter, it “must abide by the relevant procedural and substantive requirements of the [Child Custody Act]”
- noting there had clearly been a change of circumstances, despite the trial court failing to address the issue
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Kelly, Donofrio
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re HRCMichigan Court of Appeals· 2009-12-15· cited 507×
- Demski v. PetlickMichigan Court of Appeals· 2015-03-05· cited 147×
- Sturgis v. SturgisMichigan Court of Appeals· 2013-09-17· cited 32×
- Helton v. BeamanMichigan Court of Appeals· 2014-02-04· cited 30×
- In re DengMichigan Court of Appeals· 2016-03-22· cited 18×
- Joseph Richard Demski v. Cassidie PetlickMichigan Court of Appeals· 2015-03-05
- in Re Deng MinorsMichigan Court of Appeals· 2016-03-22
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court· 2000-06-05· cited 6,943×
- Berger v. BergerMichigan Court of Appeals· 2008-01-31· cited 445×
- In Re RoodMichigan Supreme Court· 2009-04-02· cited 364×
- Vodvarka v. GrasmeyerMichigan Court of Appeals· 2004-02-19· cited 278×
- Sinicropi v. MazurekMichigan Court of Appeals· 2007-03-14· cited 161×
- Corporan v. HentonMichigan Court of Appeals· 2009-03-05· cited 129×
- Phillips v. JordanMichigan Court of Appeals· 2000-07-26· cited 129×
- Foskett v. FoskettMichigan Court of Appeals· 2001-10-19· cited 120×
- McIntosh v. McIntoshMichigan Court of Appeals· 2009-02-17· cited 115×
- In Re AMBMichigan Court of Appeals· 2002-01-25· cited 83×
- Rittershaus v. RittershausMichigan Court of Appeals· 2007-03-30· cited 82×
- Harvey v. HarveyMichigan Supreme Court· 2004-06-09· cited 79×
- In Re ClausenMichigan Supreme Court· 1993-07-08· cited 79×
- In Re B and JMichigan Court of Appeals· 2008-05-13· cited 76×
- MacIntyre v. MacIntyreMichigan Court of Appeals· 2005-10-26· cited 73×
- People v. PettyMichigan Supreme Court· 2003-07-17· cited 51×
- DeRose v. DeRoseMichigan Supreme Court· 2003-07-31· cited 46×
- Bowers v. BowersMichigan Court of Appeals· 1991-06-18· cited 44×
- Lme v. ArsMichigan Court of Appeals· 2004-06-08· cited 39×
- Ryan v. RyanMichigan Court of Appeals· 2004-04-02· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.