Grossman v. Sawdy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on the IRS's interpretation of the Local and National Standards in concluding that a debtor must have a car payment to take the ownership cost deduction
• relying on the IRS’s interpretation of the Local and National Standards in concluding that a debtor must have a car payment to take the ownership cost deduction
• “[T]he word ‘applicable’ is meant to modify the term ‘monthly expenses.’ Therefore, the deduction is to be used if and only if the debtor actually has the monthly expense of an actual car payment.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hildebrand v. Kimbro (In Re Kimbro)
  Sixth Circuit· 2008-06-12· cited 48×
• In Re Ransom
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-08-14· cited 30×
• Pearson v. Stewart (In Re Pearson)
  Tenth Circuit· 2008-07-28· cited 25×
• Musselman v. eCast Settlement Corp. (In Re Musselman)
  E.D. North Carolina· 2008-09-30· cited 21×
• In Re Mati
  D. Massachusetts· 2008-06-09· cited 19×
• In Re May
  S.D. Ohio· 2008-07-07· cited 12×
• In Re Young
  D. Massachusetts· 2008-08-08· cited 11×
• In Re Morrison
  M.D. North Carolina· 2011-01-10· cited 10×
• In Re Osei
  S.D. New York· 2008-06-25· cited 9×
• In Re Pearl
  N.D. New York· 2008-09-10· cited 8×
• JNS Aviation, Inc. v. Nick Corp.
  N.D. Texas· 2009-10-29· cited 8×
• Ransom v. MBNA, America Bank, N.A.
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-08-14· cited 7×
• In Re Coffin
  D. Maine· 2008-11-18· cited 5×
• Lindskog v. M & I Bank
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2012-10-02· cited 5×
• In Re Lane
  D. Massachusetts· 2008-08-19· cited 3×
• In Re Rabener
  E.D. New York· 2010-01-21· cited 3×
• In Re Reinstein
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2008-07-28· cited 3×
• In Re Bentley
  M.D. Florida· 2008-10-28· cited 1×
• In Re Hunt
  S.D. Indiana· 2008-12-05
• In re: Ralph Kimbro v.
  Sixth Circuit· 2008-06-12

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Lamie v. United States Trustee
  Supreme Court· 2004-01-26· cited 1,956×
• In Re Hardacre
  N.D. Texas· 2006-03-06· cited 214×
• In the Matter of Robert Sheridan, Debtor-Appellee. Appeal of City National Bank of Florida
  Seventh Circuit· 1995-06-19· cited 151×
• In Re Slusher
  D. Nevada· 2007-01-17· cited 119×
• In Re Fowler
  D. Delaware· 2006-09-11· cited 84×
• In Re Harris
  E.D. Oklahoma· 2006-10-13· cited 72×
• In Re Devilliers
  E.D. Louisiana· 2007-01-09· cited 68×
• In Re Demonica
  N.D. Illinois· 2006-07-31· cited 65×
• In Re Barraza
  N.D. Texas· 2006-08-01· cited 56×
• In Re Haley
  D. New Hampshire· 2006-10-18· cited 49×
• In Re Carlin
  D. Oregon· 2006-08-18· cited 49×
• Fokkena v. Hartwick
  D. Minnesota· 2007-08-20· cited 46×
• In Re Swan
  N.D. California· 2007-04-18· cited 45×
• In Re Oliver
  W.D. Texas· 2006-08-08· cited 44×
• Neary v. Ross-Tousey (In Re Ross-Tousey)
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2007-05-21· cited 38×
• In Re Wilson
  D. Delaware· 2006-12-11· cited 36×
• In Re Watson
  D. Maryland· 2007-04-11· cited 35×
• In Re Sawdy
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2007-02-20· cited 33×
• In Re Zak
  N.D. Ohio· 2007-01-12· cited 32×
• In Re Chamberlain
  D. Arizona· 2007-04-26· cited 30×