D. Connecticut· 11/16/1993
In Re Hornes
Citations
- 160 B.R. 709
- 30 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 371
- 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 1684
- 25 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 53
- 1993 WL 477342
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that had Congress intended to make the “anti-modification clause” an exception to the general rule that unsecured claims are subject to modification, “it would have placed that clause after both the secured claims clause and the unsecured claims clause.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alan H.W. Shiff
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Stephen J. McdonaldThird Circuit· 2000-03-09· cited 210×
- Lam v. Investors Thrift (In Re Lam)Ninth Circuit· 1997-07-03· cited 90×
- Domestic Bank v. Mann (In Re Mann)First Circuit· 2000-06-30· cited 72×
- Bartee v. Tara Colony Homeowners Ass'n (In Re Bartee)Fifth Circuit· 2000-05-15· cited 66×
- Yi v. Citibank (Maryland), N.A. (In Re Yi)E.D. Virginia· 1998-04-29· cited 42×
- Wright v. Commercial Credit Corp.E.D. Virginia· 1995-02-28· cited 36×
- In Re NeverlaW.D. New York· 1996-04-16· cited 36×
- Sette v. Bello (In Re Sette)E.D. New York· 1994-03-04· cited 33×
- In Re WoodhouseD. Rhode Island· 1994-09-08· cited 33×
- Adebanjo v. Dime Savings Bank of New York, FSB (In Re Adebanjo)D. Connecticut· 1994-03-30· cited 32×
- Johnson v. Asset Management Group, LLCD. Maryland· 1998-09-30· cited 29×
- In Re GeyerS.D. California· 1996-12-16· cited 28×
- Matter of SandersD. Nebraska· 1996-11-15· cited 25×
- In Re MitchellE.D. Missouri· 1994-08-03· cited 23×
- In Re BaulerD. New Mexico· 1997-12-11· cited 22×
- Castellanos v. PNC Bank, National Ass'n (In Re Castellanos)M.D. Pennsylvania· 1994-10-07· cited 21×
- In Re LeeN.D. Alabama· 1995-02-14· cited 20×
- In Re CervelliD. New Jersey· 1997-10-20· cited 19×
- In Re ShandrewE.D. California· 1997-06-02· cited 19×
- Scheuer v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A. (In Re Scheuer)N.D. New York· 1997-02-11· cited 17×
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,657×
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-06-30· cited 1,579×
- Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court· 1992-01-15· cited 1,346×
- Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1986-11-12· cited 1,318×
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court· 1993-06-18· cited 1,200×
- Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 868×
- James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 803×
- Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court· 1991-12-10· cited 656×
- Rake v. WadeSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 431×
- Ronald E. Grubbs v. Houston First American Savings AssociationFirst Circuit· 1984-04-19· cited 213×
- Bernard Litman v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyEleventh Circuit· 1987-08-31· cited 171×
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. LitmanSupreme Court· 1988-01-11· cited 140×
- In Re Estel Ray Hougland, Ruth Evelyn Hougland, Debtors. Estel Ray Hougland Ruth Evelyn Hougland v. The Lomas & Nettleton Company, Creditor-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1989-10-04· cited 106×
- Matter of PlouffeD. Connecticut· 1993-08-18· cited 47×
- Lewis v. GrinkerSecond Circuit· 1992-01-31· cited 46×
- In Re JonesE.D. Michigan· 1993-02-23· cited 43×
- In Re Sharon E. Kerwin, Debtor, First Brandon National Bank v. Sharon E. Kerwin, Jan M. Sensenich, TrusteeFirst Circuit· 1993-06-11· cited 36×
- In Re BellamySecond Circuit· 1992-04-21· cited 35×
- 680 Fifth Avenue Associates v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Co. in Rehabilitation (In Re 680 Fifth Avenue Associates)S.D. New York· 1993-06-17· cited 28×
- Hirsch v. Citicorp Mortgage Corp. (In Re Hirsch)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1993-06-25· cited 28×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.