Skip to main content
· 3/4/1994

Sette v. Bello (In Re Sette)

Citations

  • 164 B.R. 453
  • 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 251
  • 1994 WL 67940

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[S]ince there is no equity or value in the collateral to which the Defendants’ second mortgage may attach, the Defendants’ claim, may be treated as a general unsecured claim ... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dorothy Eisenberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.