Skip to main content
· 3/30/1994

Adebanjo v. Dime Savings Bank of New York, FSB (In Re Adebanjo)

Citations

  • 165 B.R. 98
  • 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 427
  • 25 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 700
  • 1994 WL 112013

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the explicit inclusion of two rental units separate from the debtor’s principal residence in the mortgage exempted the mortgage from § 1322(b)(2)
  • “Had Congress intended the protections of [the anti-modification provision] to apply to property which serves as both the debtor’s residence and as income- producing rental property, it would have employed words to that effect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alan H.W. Shiff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.