E.D. Michigan· 2/23/1993
In Re Jones
Citations
- 152 B.R. 155
- 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 251
- 1993 WL 49925
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- collecting cases for the proposition “that statutes are to be read harmoniously whenever feasible”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Arthur J. Spector
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- First Federal Bank of California v. Weinstein (In Re Weinstein)Ninth Circuit· 1998-11-10· cited 56×
- In Re HornesD. Connecticut· 1993-11-16· cited 49×
- In Re MaylinD. Maine· 1993-06-09· cited 44×
- In the Matter of Elray and Jean Rash, Debtor. Associates Commercial Corporation v. Elray Rash and Jean E. RashFifth Circuit· 1996-07-30· cited 39×
- William J. Wade, Trustee v. Nathan Bradford and Beverly Bradford, DebtorsTenth Circuit· 1994-11-08· cited 38×
- In Re Winom Tool and Die, Inc.E.D. Michigan· 1994-11-01· cited 35×
- Dever v. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Dever)C.D. California· 1994-02-04· cited 33×
- 680 Fifth Avenue Associates v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Co. in Rehabilitation (In Re 680 Fifth Avenue Associates)S.D. New York· 1993-06-17· cited 28×
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 76,017 in Re Gloria A. McClurkin Debtor. Huntington National Bank v. Frank Pees, TrusteeSixth Circuit· 1994-08-05· cited 25×
- In Re ScheierlD. Minnesota· 1995-01-06· cited 25×
- In Re TaylorN.D. Indiana· 2003-01-23· cited 24×
- Derrick v. Richard L. Grafe Commodities, Inc. (In Re Derrick)W.D. Wisconsin· 1995-10-13· cited 20×
- In Re LeavellE.D. Virginia· 1995-11-28· cited 19×
- In Re NicewongerN.D. Ohio· 1996-02-28· cited 17×
- In Re CookeW.D. Missouri· 1994-07-08· cited 16×
- In Re Trevarrow Lanes, Inc.E.D. Michigan· 1995-05-05· cited 16×
- In Re HernandezN.D. Illinois· 1994-12-13· cited 15×
- Matter of PruittN.D. Indiana· 1996-03-22· cited 11×
- In Re SadalaM.D. Florida· 2003-06-02· cited 10×
- In Re RheaumeD. Vermont· 2003-08-05· cited 10×
Cites
126 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,657×
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court· 1988-01-20· cited 1,871×
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court· 1978-02-22· cited 1,535×
- Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court· 1992-01-15· cited 1,346×
- Garcia v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1985-02-19· cited 768×
- Union Bank v. WolasSupreme Court· 1991-12-11· cited 426×
- Memphis Bank & Trust Company v. Linda Gail WhitmanSixth Circuit· 1982-12-17· cited 249×
- Mills Music, Inc. v. SnyderSupreme Court· 1985-03-18· cited 145×
- Frank and Arlene Wilson v. Commonwealth Mortgage CorporationThird Circuit· 1990-02-09· cited 137×
- In Re Estel Ray Hougland, Ruth Evelyn Hougland, Debtors. Estel Ray Hougland Ruth Evelyn Hougland v. The Lomas & Nettleton Company, Creditor-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1989-10-04· cited 106×
- In the Matter of Walter Howard and Verlean Howard, Debtors. Sun Finance Company, Inc. v. Walter Howard and Verlean HowardFifth Circuit· 1992-09-08· cited 95×
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 73,548 in Re William and Debra Calvert, Debtors. Green Tree Acceptance, Inc. v. William and Debra CalvertEleventh Circuit· 1990-08-01· cited 93×
- In Re Danny L. Hart and Joanne E. Hart, Debtors. Eastland Mortgage Co. v. Danny L. Hart and Joanne E. HartTenth Circuit· 1991-02-26· cited 91×
- In Re Peter Gordon Balbus, Debtor. Brown and Company Securities Corporation v. Peter Gordon BalbusFourth Circuit· 1991-06-04· cited 82×
- Matter of BeardN.D. Indiana· 1990-04-03· cited 77×
- United States v. Harlan Arnold and Dorene ArnoldSixth Circuit· 1989-08-18· cited 76×
- In Re JablonskiE.D. Pennsylvania· 1987-02-19· cited 64×
- In Re FrostD. Kansas· 1985-03-08· cited 64×
- In Re BriggsE.D. Michigan· 1992-07-29· cited 63×
- In Re 266 Washington AssociatesE.D. New York· 1992-06-05· cited 63×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.