D.C. Circuit· 8/14/2020
In re: Hillary Clinton
Citations
- 970 F.3d 357
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “courts may order limited discovery where there is evidence—either at the affidavit stage or (in rarer cases) before—that the agency acted in bad faith in conducting the search” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Watkins Law & Advocacy, PLLC v. DOJD.C. Circuit· 2023-08-18· cited 29×
- Pavement Coatings Technology v. United States Geological SurveyD.C. Circuit· 2021-05-07· cited 12×
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of StateDistrict of Columbia· 2021-08-03
- Ball v. United States Marshal ServiceDistrict of Columbia· 2021-10-19
- Naumes v. Department of the ArmyDistrict of Columbia· 2022-02-28
- Cooper v. DOJDistrict of Columbia· 2022-03-01
- Cato Institute v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict of Columbia· 2022-11-02
- Patterson v. HarrisDistrict of Columbia· 2022-11-08
- Wp Company LLC v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict of Columbia· 2024-03-07
- Center for Inquiry, Inc. v. Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict of Columbia· 2024-03-14
- America First Legal Foundation v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict of Columbia· 2024-10-29
- In re: Donald TrumpD.C. Circuit· 2026-04-14
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court· 1978-06-19· cited 2,321×
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 1,878×
- Safecard Services, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionD.C. Circuit· 1991-03-01· cited 1,840×
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-11-16· cited 1,710×
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1940-02-26· cited 1,204×
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court· 1965-01-18· cited 1,194×
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-11-13· cited 1,120×
- Kissinger v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court· 1980-03-03· cited 892×
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. HollandSupreme Court· 1953-11-30· cited 826×
- Susan D. Goland and Patricia B. Skidmore v. Central Intelligence AgencyD.C. Circuit· 1978-05-23· cited 821×
- Harold Weisberg v. U.S. Department of Justice, (Two Cases). Harold Weisberg v. U.S. Department of Justice. (Two Cases)D.C. Circuit· 1984-10-05· cited 796×
- The Nation Magazine, Washington Bureau, and Max Holland v. United States Customs ServiceD.C. Circuit· 1995-12-08· cited 780×
- Brayton v. Office of United States Trade RepresentativeD.C. Circuit· 2011-04-19· cited 711×
- Sims v. BlotSecond Circuit· 2008-07-18· cited 653×
- United States v. RyanSupreme Court· 1971-05-24· cited 639×
- Michele Steinberg v. United States Department of JusticeD.C. Circuit· 1994-05-27· cited 596×
- Ground Saucer Watch, Inc., Harvey Brody v. Central Intelligence AgencyD.C. Circuit· 1981-08-17· cited 582×
- GUILLERMO FELIPE DUEÑAS ITURRALDE v. COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCYD.C. Circuit· 2003-01-17· cited 566×
- Ex Parte FaheySupreme Court· 1947-06-23· cited 464×
- Wilbur v. Central Intelligence AgencyD.C. Circuit· 2004-01-30· cited 400×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.