· 8/17/1981
Ground Saucer Watch, Inc., Harvey Brody v. Central Intelligence Agency
Citations
- 692 F.2d 770
- 224 U.S. App. D.C. 1
- 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 18483
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “unadorned speculation” cannot compel further discovery
- “Indeed, if the release of previously withheld materials were held to constitute evidence of present ‘bad faith,’ similar evidence would exist in every FOIA case involving additional releases of documents after the filing of suit.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wright, Van Dusen Ginsburg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.