N.D. Illinois· 12/13/1994
In Re Hernandez
Citations
- 175 B.R. 962
- 33 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 146
- 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18235
- 1994 WL 734800
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “the meaning of ‘allowed secured claim’ in Section 1325 is the same as the meaning of that term in Section 506(a)”
- holding that “ ‘retain the lien securing such claim’ as used in Section 1325 is best interpreted to mean that ‘such claim’ refers to the allowed secured claim as defined in Section 506(a)”
- listing cases holding that Dewsnup does not apply in Chapter 13 proceedings
- “In Dewsnup, ... the Supreme Court decided that the phrase ‘allowed secured claim’ in Section 506(d) meant a claim which was both allowed and secured, regardless of the extent of the security.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nordberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Strong v. United States Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service (In Re Strong)N.D. Illinois· 1996-12-10· cited 26×
- Bank One Chicago, NA v. FlowersN.D. Illinois· 1995-06-30· cited 24×
- In Re RheaumeD. Vermont· 2003-08-05· cited 10×
- In Re ZakowskiE.D. Wisconsin· 1997-09-10· cited 9×
- In Re GintherN.D. Illinois· 2010-04-22· cited 6×
- In Re CookD. New Jersey· 2010-07-14· cited 4×
- In Re WoodsW.D. Tennessee· 2000-12-14· cited 4×
- Brinson v. United States (In re Brinson)N.D. Illinois· 2013-01-28· cited 2×
- Cole v. Cenlar Federal Savings Bank (In Re Cole)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1996-11-06· cited 1×
- Pees v. DAN Joint Venture II (In Re Claar)S.D. Ohio· 2007-04-30· cited 1×
- In re ThompsonN.D. Texas· 1998-08-27· cited 1×
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court· 1992-01-15· cited 1,346×
- Johnson v. Home State BankSupreme Court· 1991-06-10· cited 1,263×
- Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 868×
- In Re Longardner & Associates, Inc., Debtor. Appeal of Landahl, Brown & Weed Associates, IncSeventh Circuit· 1988-08-24· cited 175×
- In Re Joseph and Sandra Schaitz, Debtors. Appeal of Gwenn L. Webb and Colton WebbSeventh Circuit· 1990-09-20· cited 93×
- Landahl, Brown & Weed Associates, Inc. v. Longardner & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court· 1989-02-21· cited 55×
- In Re JonesE.D. Michigan· 1993-02-23· cited 43×
- William J. Wade, Trustee v. Nathan Bradford and Beverly Bradford, DebtorsTenth Circuit· 1994-11-08· cited 38×
- Dever v. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Dever)C.D. California· 1994-02-04· cited 33×
- In Re Murry-HudsonN.D. California· 1992-12-08· cited 29×
- McDonough v. Plaistow Cooperative Bank (In Re McDonough)D. Massachusetts· 1994-03-29· cited 29×
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Lee (In Re Lee)D. Minnesota· 1993-12-21· cited 28×
- Sapos v. Provident Institution of SavingsThird Circuit· 1992-06-26· cited 28×
- In Re ButlerE.D. Oklahoma· 1992-03-20· cited 17×
- In Re CookeW.D. Missouri· 1994-07-08· cited 16×
- In Re HargisE.D. Tennessee· 1989-08-21· cited 16×
- Gibbons v. Opechee Distributors, Inc. (In Re Gibbons)D. New Hampshire· 1993-12-28· cited 14×
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Pickett (In Re Pickett)M.D. Tennessee· 1992-11-12· cited 12×
- In Re HernandezN.D. Illinois· 1993-12-29· cited 11×
- Gammon v. Chrysler Credit Corp. (In Re Gammon)W.D. Oklahoma· 1993-05-24· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.