In Re Butler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “As a result of the Court’s limiting language, we find the applicability of the Dewsnup rationale to be only in Chapter 7 liquidation cases and inapplicable to the other chapters of the Bankruptcy Code.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Jones
  E.D. Michigan· 1993-02-23· cited 43×
• William J. Wade, Trustee v. Nathan Bradford and Beverly Bradford, Debtors
  Tenth Circuit· 1994-11-08· cited 38×
• Dever v. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Dever)
  C.D. California· 1994-02-04· cited 33×
• 680 Fifth Avenue Associates v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Co. in Rehabilitation (In Re 680 Fifth Avenue Associates)
  S.D. New York· 1993-06-17· cited 28×
• Taffi v. United States (In Re Taffi)
  C.D. California· 1992-08-17· cited 24×
• Bank One Chicago, NA v. Flowers
  N.D. Illinois· 1995-06-30· cited 24×
• In Re Hernandez
  N.D. Illinois· 1994-12-13· cited 15×
• Blue Pacific Car Wash, Inc. v. St. Croix County (In Re Blue Pacific Car Wash, Inc.)
  W.D. Wisconsin· 1992-11-12· cited 11×
• In Re De Kleinman
  S.D. New York· 1993-07-01· cited 9×
• In Re Haas
  S.D. Alabama· 1996-03-06· cited 3×
• In Re Rhea
  S.D. Alabama· 1997-10-02