Skip to main content
· 8/24/1988

In Re Longardner & Associates, Inc., Debtor. Appeal of Landahl, Brown & Weed Associates, Inc

Citations

  • 855 F.2d 455
  • 11 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1310
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 11916
  • 18 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 574
  • 1988 WL 90286

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • following Rule 9022(a) strictly and holding that creditor's failure to receive notice of entry of order confirming reorganization plan was not alone sufficient grounds for extending the time to appeal that order beyond the constraints of Rule 8002(c)
  • while the presumption is weakened by the absence of a zip code, it is strengthened by the fact that the notice was never returned
  • court did not clearly err in finding that notice of hearing was mailed when it was addressed properly and not returned to clerk’s office
  • notice of hearing properly mailed is “reasonably calculated to reach interested parties” and satisfies due process, whether actually received or not
  • “section 1144 is the only avenue for revoking confirmation of a plan of reorganization”
  • section §1144 is the only avenue for revoking confirmation of a chapter 11 plan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Coffey, Ripple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.