Julia Karen Eisemann v. Miriam Greene, M.D.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the district court’s conclusion of bad faith based almost entirely on motion’s lack of merit was insufficient in light of lack of factual specificity
• explaining that “a court must find clear evidence that . . . the claims were brought in bad faith” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• noting that “[i]t is sometimes possible to infer bad faith from the meritlessness of a motion”
• reversing the imposition of sanctions where \the [c]ourt's conclusory determination that Eisemann's motion was filed in bad faith rested almost entirely on its lack of merit\
• reversing the imposition of sanctions where \the [c]ourt's conclusory determination that Eisemann's motion was filed in bad faith rested almost entirely on its lack of merit\
• overturning imposition of sanctions where district court’s “conclusory determination that [the] motion was filed in bad faith rested almost entirely on its lack of merit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).