California Supreme Court· 12/13/1967
In re Harris
Citations
- 67 Cal. 2d 876
- 434 P.2d 615
- 64 Cal. Rptr. 319
- 1967 Cal. LEXIS 273
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- each holding that Kent is not of constitutional proportions and that Kent was not relied upon as authority for the Gault decision
- each holding that Kent is not of constitutional proportions and that Kent was not relied upon as authority for the Gault decision
- 'Judgments of conviction entered following waiver of juvenile court jurisdiction and final before Gault was decided \threaten to be of significant quantity.\'
- Cal.Penal Code § 1157 provides that a failure to determine degree shall be deemed to be lesser
- Cal.Penal Code § 1157 provides that a failure to determine degree shall be deemed to be lesser
- No. 71-1118, before Chambers, Choy and Muecke, JJ.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Traynor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Manduley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 2002-04-17· cited 249×
- In Re SturmCalifornia Supreme Court· 1974-04-18· cited 125×
- John Wayne Kemplen v. State of MarylandFourth Circuit· 1970-07-10· cited 117×
- People v. StephensonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1974-01-16· cited 93×
- Neller v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1968-08-12· cited 53×
- In Re LoveCalifornia Supreme Court· 1974-04-11· cited 44×
- Billy Ray Powell v. Carl G. Hocker, WardenNinth Circuit· 1971-12-10· cited 36×
- Jackie Harris v. Raymond K. Procunier, Director of the Department of Corrections of the Stateof CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 1974-10-29· cited 30×
- Brumley v. Charles R. Denney Juvenile Center of Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1970-02-26· cited 29×
- Jefferson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 1969-06-09· cited 26×
- Bouge v. ReedOregon Supreme Court· 1969-10-22· cited 24×
- State v. LuederSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1977-07-22· cited 23×
- People v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1978-08-24· cited 21×
- In Re PfeifferCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1968-07-29· cited 17×
- People v. J.F.California Court of Appeal· 1969-01-13· cited 16×
- Eyman v. Superior Court in and for County of PinalCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1968-12-23· cited 13×
- In Re the Welfare of LewisWashington Supreme Court· 1977-05-19· cited 13×
- McRae v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 1977-01-27· cited 11×
- People v. AllgoodCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1976-01-16· cited 11×
- Stanley v. PeytonW.D. Virginia· 1968-10-09· cited 11×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 5,473×
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 3,002×
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-03-22· cited 2,202×
- People v. FeggansCalifornia Supreme Court· 1967-10-03· cited 246×
- In Re JamesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1952-01-22· cited 146×
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1965-10-01· cited 139×
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court· 1967-12-13· cited 80×
- People v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court· 1957-11-01· cited 66×
- People v. DotsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-08-10· cited 50×
- In Re McInturffCalifornia Supreme Court· 1951-10-26· cited 41×
- Smith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1967-03-03· cited 39×
- People v. YeagerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1961-02-14· cited 29×
- In Re WellsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1967-12-13· cited 25×
- People v. HammondCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1938-04-26· cited 23×
- People v. RenteriaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1943-09-14· cited 22×
- People v. FernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1963-12-02· cited 18×
- People v. VerdierCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1950-02-09· cited 13×
- Knight v. Superior Court of Tehama CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1951-02-08· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.