Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
California Supreme Court· 7/29/1993

In Re Harris

Citations

  • 855 P.2d 391
  • 5 Cal. 4th 813
  • 21 Cal. Rptr. 2d 373
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 9723
  • 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5752
  • 1993 Cal. LEXIS 3651

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting habeas relief where the petitioner 16 claiming sentencing error, even though the alleged sentencing error could have been 17 raised on direct appeal
  • discussing In re Dixon, 41 Cal.2d 756, 264 P.2d 513 (1953)
  • the Waltreus rule applies to claims that were previously raised and rejected on direct appeal
  • the California Supreme Court rejects challenges to Ganahl 's status as precedent
  • The Dixon \rule is now firmly established and often repeated without much explication.\
  • the California Supreme Court rejects challenges to Ganahl’s status as precedent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lucas, Mosk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

195 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

99 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named In Re Harris

257 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.