California Supreme Court· 1/22/1952

In Re James

Citations

38 Cal. 2d 302
240 P.2d 596
1952 Cal. LEXIS 174

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[Bjecause of his ignorance, petitioner did not realize that he had any grounds for attacking the judgment until long after the time for appeal had expired.”
“[B]ecause of his igno- rance, petitioner did not realize that he had any grounds for attacking the judgment until long after the time for appeal had expired.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Traynor, Edmonds

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

105 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named In Re James

103 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.