California Supreme Court· 10/30/1968
In Re Harris
Citations
- 69 Cal. 2d 486
- 72 Cal. Rptr. 340
- 446 P.2d 148
- 1968 Cal. LEXIS 258
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- due-process clause requires that civil defendant, imprisoned through mesne process, be notified of right to hearing when challenging lawfulness of arrest
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Traynor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Randone v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court· 1971-08-26· cited 187×
- Safer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1975-09-19· cited 76×
- Klim v. JonesN.D. California· 1970-07-17· cited 75×
- Otton v. ZaboracAlaska Supreme Court· 1974-08-19· cited 60×
- In Re TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1971-06-24· cited 46×
- Security Savings Bank v. MuellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1981-07-22· cited 31×
- Landrigan v. McElroySupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1983-03-16· cited 28×
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1971-02-04· cited 27×
- McDermott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1972-02-25· cited 26×
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1970-12-31· cited 26×
- Vail v. QuinlanS.D. New York· 1976-01-07· cited 26×
- Powell v. State Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1980-12-19· cited 22×
- Yoder v. County of CumberlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1971-06-02· cited 20×
- Menefee & Son v. Department of Food & AgricultureCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-03-18· cited 18×
- Desmond v. HacheyD. Maine· 1970-07-21· cited 15×
- Perlmutter v. DeRoweSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1971-03-01· cited 12×
- People v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1972-12-14· cited 10×
- Sandrini Brothers v. VossCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1992-07-08· cited 6×
- Vail v. QuinlanS.D. New York· 1975-01-13· cited 4×
- People v. RuizCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2020-12-30
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 5,473×
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1932-11-07· cited 4,979×
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court· 1965-04-27· cited 2,943×
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court· 1948-05-03· cited 1,913×
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-04-13· cited 880×
- Specht v. PattersonSupreme Court· 1967-05-29· cited 837×
- Coe v. Armour Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court· 1915-05-03· cited 263×
- In Re JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1965-01-28· cited 225×
- Peterson v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court· 1963-05-20· cited 197×
- In Re SmileyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1967-05-05· cited 157×
- Steen v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court· 1945-06-29· cited 100×
- In Re PetersenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1958-10-31· cited 88×
- Endler v. SchutzbankCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-01-26· cited 85×
- People v. NormanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1967-07-07· cited 32×
- Murray v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1955-05-27· cited 28×
- Ex parte Yonetaro FkumotoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1898-03-18· cited 17×
- Pousson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1958-12-08· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.