Second Circuit· 7/5/1977
United States v. Howard E. Saft
Citations
- 558 F.2d 1073
- 41 A.L.R. Fed. 859
- 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 12567
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- prejudice to the government may be considered by the court in the exercise of its discretion even where defendant has not shown sufficient grounds for permitting withdrawal of his plea
- prejudice to the government may be considered by the court in the exercise of its discretion even where defendant has not shown sufficient grounds for permitting withdrawal of his plea
- failure to inform defendant of one or two Rule 11 rights not requiring remand on basis of remaining record
- approach in Saft adopted by the 1983 amendment to Rule 332(d), as noted in Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(d) Advisory Committee Note at 4
- indictment read by clerk to inform defendant of the nature of the charges
- reading of indictment by court clerk may be sufficient
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Friendly, Timbers, Meskill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
98 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Robert Maher, AKA \Bob M.\, Peter Mancusi, Andrew GiordanoSecond Circuit· 1997-03-25· cited 303×
- United States v. Winston Eugene DaytonFifth Circuit· 1979-10-18· cited 239×
- United States v. James Buckles, A/K/A Jimmy BucklesEleventh Circuit· 1988-04-27· cited 206×
- Albert J. Doherty v. American Motors Corporation, a Foreign CorporationSixth Circuit· 1984-02-24· cited 195×
- State v. BadgettSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-07-08· cited 184×
- United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Jose Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1992-07-24· cited 182×
- United States v. Gregory Angelo SpencerSixth Circuit· 1987-12-31· cited 176×
- United States v. Michael AlexanderSixth Circuit· 1991-11-04· cited 147×
- United States v. Jane ReadNinth Circuit· 1986-02-10· cited 134×
- United States v. Maximiliano BaezSixth Circuit· 1996-06-27· cited 113×
- United States v. Ramon Rios-OrtizNinth Circuit· 1987-10-22· cited 112×
- United States v. TorresSecond Circuit· 1997-11-17· cited 108×
- State v. ClarkNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1989-03-09· cited 106×
- United States v. Latroy D. Ray, Johnny Lee May, and Boyd McChristionSeventh Circuit· 1987-10-02· cited 96×
- United States v. Hector Acevedo RamosFirst Circuit· 1987-01-30· cited 94×
- Harold Omar Mack v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 1980-12-03· cited 85×
- United States v. Alonzo L. Harris A/K/A \Letter\ Alonzo L. HarrisThird Circuit· 1995-01-10· cited 83×
- United States v. Walter Deland TriplettSixth Circuit· 1987-09-21· cited 80×
- United States v. Martinez, Julio. Appeal of Julio MartinezThird Circuit· 1986-04-24· cited 75×
- State v. GodekSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-11-25· cited 74×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 7,191×
- Cone v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court· 1947-03-03· cited 464×
- United States v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1977-05-23· cited 408×
- Bolivar Irizarry v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1975-01-23· cited 89×
- United States v. Michael JournetSecond Circuit· 1976-11-01· cited 75×
- United States v. Robert MichaelsonSecond Circuit· 1977-03-31· cited 72×
- Chance v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1965-12-06· cited 59×
- United States v. Charles J. Giuliano, Mario Prezioso and Chester Zochowski, A/K/A Chester GraySecond Circuit· 1965-07-09· cited 44×
- Joseph Del Vecchio v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1977-05-24· cited 40×
- United States v. Roberto Antonio FernandezSecond Circuit· 1970-07-08· cited 21×
- Joseph Seiller v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1975-12-01· cited 21×
- United States v. PanebiancoSecond Circuit· 1954-02-08· cited 15×
- United States v. RogersD. Connecticut· 1968-08-19· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.