E.D. New York· 3/25/2013
In re Gentiva Securities Litigation
Citations
- 932 F. Supp. 2d 352
- 2013 WL 1200334
- 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42102
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an announcement of a governmental investigation into the precise subject matter which forms the basis of the fraudulent practices at issue can qualify as a partial corrective disclosure for purposes of loss causation
- finding that the allegations viewed as a whole did not give rise to a compelling inference of scienter
- finding that defendants’ representations concerning company’s financial results were materially false or misleading when they failed to disclose alleged Medicare fraud scheme
- finding that the plaintiff “failed to comply with Rule 9(b) with regard to the Section 11 claim[] because it expressly disclaim[ed] all allegations of scienter”
- determining that the plaintiff’s allegations that the individual defendants collectively sold approximately 292,000 shares for $7.1 million in proceeds was insufficient because the complaint only identified reaped proceeds and not net profits
- stating that “courts have looked at the following to indicate that a Section 11 claim sounds in fraud: (1) the complaint contains merely a blanket disclaimer that the plaintiffs do not allege fraud for the purposes of the Securities Act claims; (2
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spatt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strougo v. Barclays PLCS.D. New York· 2015-04-24· cited 69×
- Set Capital LLC v. Credit Suisse Group AGSecond Circuit· 2021-04-27· cited 57×
- In re Banco Bradesco S.A. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2017-09-29· cited 54×
- Public Employees' Retirement System v. Amedisys, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2014-10-02· cited 53×
- In re Braskem S.A. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2017-03-30· cited 42×
- In re Sanofi Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2016-01-06· cited 32×
- Lipow v. Net1 UEPS Technologies, Inc.S.D. New York· 2015-09-16· cited 29×
- In re Petrochina Co. Ltd. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2015-08-03· cited 25×
- Fries v. N. Oil & Gas, Inc.S.D. Illinois· 2018-01-10· cited 21×
- Plymouth County Retirement Ass'n v. Primo Water Corp.M.D. North Carolina· 2013-08-14· cited 18×
- Pehlivanian v. China Gerui Advanced Materials Group, Ltd.S.D. New York· 2015-12-23· cited 15×
- Nguyen v. New Link Genetics Corp.S.D. Illinois· 2018-03-29· cited 15×
- Washtenaw County Employees Retirement System v. Avid Technology, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 2014-06-27· cited 13×
- Zhong Zheng v. Pingtan Marine Enter. Ltd.E.D. New York· 2019-03-31· cited 13×
- Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund, Inc. v. Navient Corp.D. Delaware· 2019-01-29· cited 12×
- Kux-Kardos v. VimpelCom, Ltd.S.D. New York· 2016-04-27· cited 11×
- Utesch v. Lannett Co.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2019-05-15· cited 10×
- Rex & Roberta Ling Living Trust U/A December 6, 1990 v. B Commc'ns Ltd.S.D. Illinois· 2018-09-27· cited 8×
- In re Gentiva Securities LitigationE.D. New York· 2013-09-19· cited 8×
- In re ITT Educational Services, Inc. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2014-07-22· cited 7×
Cites
94 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court· 1974-04-17· cited 13,385×
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court· 2007-06-21· cited 6,044×
- Harris v. MillsSecond Circuit· 2009-07-09· cited 5,185×
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 4,763×
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 3,533×
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court· 1988-03-07· cited 3,007×
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court· 1976-06-14· cited 2,447×
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Second Circuit· 2007-07-11· cited 2,369×
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court· 2005-04-19· cited 2,236×
- McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Second Circuit· 2007-04-06· cited 1,966×
- Shaw v. Digital Equipment Corp.First Circuit· 1996-05-07· cited 855×
- Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court· 1962-02-26· cited 730×
- Novak v. KasaksSecond Circuit· 2000-06-21· cited 686×
- ECA, Local 134 IBEW Joint Pension Trust of Chicago v. JP Morgan Chase Co.Second Circuit· 2009-01-21· cited 674×
- Metzler Investment GMBH v. Corinthian Colleges, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2008-08-26· cited 568×
- San Leandro Emergency Medical Group Profit Sharing Plan v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Second Circuit· 1996-01-25· cited 563×
- Rombach v. ChangSecond Circuit· 2004-01-20· cited 523×
Other cases named In re Gentiva Securities Litigation
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.