In Re Genlime Group, L.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the unambiguous language of Section 331 requires notice and a hearing preceding disbursements to professionals
• finding that proposed postpetition disbursements to professionals absent notice and a hearing did not comply with § 331
• finding postpetition disbursements to professionals subject to Section 331 even where characterized as “retainer” payments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).