N.D. Ohio· 2/18/1994
In Re Genlime Group, L.P.
Citations
- 167 B.R. 453
- 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 385
- 1994 WL 114349
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the unambiguous language of Section 331 requires notice and a hearing preceding disbursements to professionals
- finding that proposed postpetition disbursements to professionals absent notice and a hearing did not comply with § 331
- finding postpetition disbursements to professionals subject to Section 331 even where characterized as “retainer” payments
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walter J. Krasniewski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pennsylvania, Department of Labor & Industry v. Cunningham & Chernicoff, P.C. (In Re Pannebaker Custom Cabinet Corp.)M.D. Pennsylvania· 1996-07-25· cited 31×
- In Re Act Manufacturing, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 2002-08-08· cited 19×
- In Re Mariner Post-Acute Network, Inc.D. Delaware· 2000-11-16· cited 9×
- In Re W & W Protection Agency, Inc.S.D. Ohio· 1996-07-25· cited 6×
- In Re Perrysburg Marketplace Co.N.D. Ohio· 1994-11-23· cited 5×
- In re FennigN.D. Ohio· 1994-10-28· cited 3×
- In Re Pittsburgh Corning Corp.W.D. Pennsylvania· 2000-11-10· cited 2×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,657×
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court· 1992-03-09· cited 3,104×
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court· 1993-03-03· cited 2,968×
- Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. DavenportSupreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 854×
- Landreth Timber Co. v. LandrethSupreme Court· 1985-05-28· cited 514×
- HCSC-Laundry v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1981-02-23· cited 257×
- Bulova Watch Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-04-17· cited 224×
- U.S. Trustee v. Knudsen Corp. (In Re Knudsen Corp.)Ninth Circuit· 1988-03-31· cited 48×
- In Re Printing Dimensions, Inc.D. Maryland· 1993-05-04· cited 30×
- Hill v. Fidelity Financial Services (In Re Hill)S.D. Ohio· 1993-03-15· cited 16×
- In re K & R Mining, Inc.N.D. Ohio· 1989-10-03· cited 16×
- In Re ICS Cybernetics, Inc.N.D. New York· 1989-01-09· cited 11×
- Matter of Dandy Lion Inns of AmericaD. Nebraska· 1990-10-15· cited 10×
- In Re Shelly's, Inc.S.D. Ohio· 1988-07-08· cited 8×
- In Re Cal-Inland, Inc.D. Minnesota· 1991-02-15· cited 7×
Other cases named In Re Genlime Group, L.P.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.