HCSC-Laundry v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a specific provision takes precedence over a general one
• holding that a specific provision takes precedence over a general one
• stating that “it is a basic principle of statutory construction that a specific statute ... controls over a general provision ... particularly when the two are interrelated and closely positioned”
• stating that “it is a basic principle of statutory construction that a specific statute ... controls over a general provision ..., particularly when the two are interrelated and closely positioned.”
• rejecting argument that specific limitation on remedies in one provision of a statute trumped a general provision for remedies in another section
• noting that “it is a basic principle of statutory construction that a specific statute . . . controls over a general provision . . . , particularly when the two are interrelated and closely positioned”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named HCSC-Laundry v. United States

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Hcsc-Laundry v. United States
  Third Circuit· 1980-06-10· cited 8×
• HCSC-Laundry v. United States
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1979-07-10· cited 8×