In Re Fox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that generally, federal court judgments are considered final for collateral estoppel purposes, even when the judgment is on appeal
• explaining that a “preyudgment writ of attachment [is] designed to preserve the status quo”
• listing cases and declining to adopt per se rule that filing chapter 11 case in lieu of filing supersedeas bond constitutes bad faith; debtor had timely filed disclosure statement and plan
• timing of the petition, motive of debtor, and accuracy of the schedules
• “The evidence suggests that the Debtor did not file this bankruptcy solely to avoid posting a supersedeas bond, but was also motivated by a desire to reorganize or liquidate in an orderly fashion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 1999-12-29· cited 152×
• In Re Sletteland
  S.D. New York· 2001-03-28· cited 28×
• United Phosphorus Ltd. v. Fox (In Re Fox)
  Tenth Circuit· 1999-11-30· cited 23×
• In Re Valley View Shopping Center, L.P.
  D. Kansas· 2001-02-02· cited 22×
• In re Mense
  C.D. California· 2014-04-15· cited 11×
• In Re Local Union 722 International Brotherhood of Teamsters
  N.D. Illinois· 2009-10-06· cited 10×
• In Re Paolini
  E.D. Virginia· 2004-06-01· cited 8×
• In Matter of Strug-Division, LLC
  N.D. Illinois· 2007-09-14· cited 8×
• Coleman v. Community Trust Bank, N.A. (In Re Coleman)
  W.D. Virginia· 2003-09-30· cited 7×
• In re Hyatt
  D. New Mexico· 2012-09-26· cited 6×
• Miles v. Rutledge (In Re Rutledge)
  D. Kansas· 1999-07-09· cited 5×
• Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Guy F. Atkinson Co. of California (In Re Guy F. Atkinson Co. of California)
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-12-06· cited 4×
• In Re Dilling
  N.D. Illinois· 2005-02-24· cited 4×

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.
  Supreme Court· 1988-01-20· cited 1,871×
• United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 1,643×
• Phelps v. Hamilton
  Tenth Circuit· 1997-08-12· cited 414×
• Robi v. Five Platters, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1988-01-27· cited 322×
• In Re Carol Freeman Marsch, Debtor (Two Cases). John D. Marsch, Claimant-Appellant v. Carol F. Marsch, (Two Cases)
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-09-14· cited 234×
• Carolin Corporation v. Robert J. Miller, Jr.
  Fourth Circuit· 1989-09-28· cited 226×
• In the Matter of Woodbrook Associates, Debtor-Appellant
  Seventh Circuit· 1994-05-12· cited 164×
• In Re William Wallace, Debtor. Mark Klemens v. William Wallace
  Tenth Circuit· 1988-02-29· cited 156×
• In Re Timbers Of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.
  Fifth Circuit· 1987-01-09· cited 101×
• In Re Wally Findlay Galleries (New York), Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1984-02-10· cited 56×
• In Re Alton Telegraph Printing Co.
  S.D. Illinois· 1981-10-01· cited 38×
• In Re Karum Group, Inc.
  W.D. Washington· 1986-10-15· cited 32×
• In Re Smith
  W.D. Kentucky· 1986-03-07· cited 29×
• Stage I Land Co. v. United States Housing & Urban Development Department
  D. Minnesota· 1986-08-14· cited 27×
• In Re Winslow
  D. Colorado· 1991-02-05· cited 20×
• In Re Powell Bros. Ice Co.
  D. Kansas· 1984-01-23· cited 19×
• Wright v. Turner (In Re Turner)
  Ninth Circuit· 1997-01-02· cited 18×
• In Re Boynton
  S.D. California· 1995-07-13· cited 18×
• In Re Corey
  D. Hawaii· 1984-11-15· cited 17×
• Silva v. Smith's Pacific Shrimp, Inc. (In Re Silva)
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-10-25· cited 16×