Robi v. Five Platters, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he issue must have been ‘actually decided’ after a ‘full and fair opportunity’ for litigation”
• holding that a pending appeal does not vitiate the preclusive effect of a federal district court judgment
• concluding a state’s preclusion rules apply to 18 “judgments issued by courts of that state”
• stating that appeal of a judgment does not affect the 20 “firmness” of the decision for purposes of issue preclusion
• stating that “we apply California law of res 10 judicata to the California judgment, New York law to the New York 11 judgment, and federal law to the federal judgments”
• stating that “we apply California law of res 10 judicata to the California judgment, New York law to the New York 11 judgment, and federal law to the federal judgments”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

150 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Herb Reed Enterprises, LLC v. Florida Entertainment Management, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2013-12-02· cited 344×
• Sil-Flo, Inc. v. SFHC, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 1990-10-30· cited 314×
• Daniel Virnich v. Jeffrey Vorwald
  Seventh Circuit· 2011-12-20· cited 311×
• Moore v. Brewster
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-09-23· cited 252×
• Neilson v. Union Bank of California, N.A.
  C.D. California· 2003-10-20· cited 244×
• Raymond Keith Foster, Keith Mfg. Co., and Keith Sales, Co. v. Hallco Manufacturing Co., Inc., and Olof A. Hallstrom
  Federal Circuit· 1991-11-12· cited 189×
• Gina Shaw v. James K. Hahn John Emerson James Pearson Thomas Hokinson
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-06-06· cited 179×
• Kopp v. Fair Political Practices Commission
  California Supreme Court· 1995-11-30· cited 155×
• In Re Sammy G. Daily, Debtor. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., Receiver for Indian Springs State Bank v. Sammy G. Daily
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-02-03· cited 153×
• Valley National Bank v. A.E. Rouse & Co.
  Ninth Circuit· 1997-08-11· cited 120×
• Martha Robi v. Five Platters, Inc., Jean Bennett, and Buck Ram
  Ninth Circuit· 1990-11-14· cited 119×
• Baltrusch v. Baltrusch
  Montana Supreme Court· 2006-03-07· cited 107×
• Ursula Holcombe v. David Hosmer Richard Kirkland, and Dale Liebherr
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-02-23· cited 106×
• Sherman P. Hawkins v. Henry Risley, Warden, Montana State Prison
  Ninth Circuit· 1993-01-25· cited 94×
• Hydranautics v. Filmtec Corporation, Opinion
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-02-23· cited 93×
• Galvin v. Hay
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-03-18· cited 87×
• Robi v. Reed
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-04-02· cited 75×
• Unnamed case
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-08-13· cited 75×
• Resolution Trust Corporation v. Charles H. Keating, Jr., Resolution Trust Corporation v. Mary Elaine Keating Charles H. Keating, Jr.
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-08-06· cited 73×
• Guild Wineries and Distilleries, an Agricultural Cooperative, Plaintiff v. Whitehall Co., Ltd., a Massachusetts Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 1988-08-05· cited 63×