W.D. Kentucky· 3/7/1986
In Re Smith
Citations
- 58 B.R. 448
- 14 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 512
- 1986 Bankr. LEXIS 6552
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[d]ue regard for principles of federalism requires no less than our unrelenting respect for the controlling state law on supersedeas bonds.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Deitz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re HBA East, Inc.E.D. New York· 1988-06-03· cited 60×
- In Re Karum Group, Inc.W.D. Washington· 1986-10-15· cited 32×
- In Re SlettelandS.D. New York· 2001-03-28· cited 28×
- Southmark Corp. v. Riddle (In Re Southmark Corp.)N.D. Texas· 1992-02-11· cited 24×
- In Re FoxD. Kansas· 1999-03-05· cited 19×
- In Re Business Information Co., Inc.W.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-01-10· cited 18×
- In Re BoyntonS.D. California· 1995-07-13· cited 18×
- In Re Sherwood Enterprises, Inc.S.D. Texas· 1989-01-27· cited 15×
- In Re DavisS.D. Texas· 1987-12-18· cited 13×
- In re MenseC.D. California· 2014-04-15· cited 11×
- Mueller v. Sparklet Devices, Inc. (In Re Sparklet Devices, Inc.)E.D. Missouri· 1993-04-30· cited 10×
- In Re RobertsN.D. Oklahoma· 1990-08-09· cited 8×
- In Re PaoliniE.D. Virginia· 2004-06-01· cited 8×
- In Re CaseyS.D. California· 1996-07-11· cited 7×
- In Re FordS.D. Alabama· 1987-06-18· cited 6×
- In Re Primary Health Services, Inc.N.D. Ohio· 1998-02-13· cited 6×
- In Re ByrdW.D. Washington· 1994-10-04· cited 6×
- In re HyattD. New Mexico· 2012-09-26· cited 6×
- Matter of NamerE.D. Louisiana· 1992-04-08· cited 5×
- In Re the Bridge to Life, Inc.E.D. New York· 2005-09-30· cited 3×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In the Matter of Little Creek Development Company, Debtor. Little Creek Development Co. v. Commonwealth Mortgage Corp.Fifth Circuit· 1986-01-03· cited 489×
- In Re Johns-Manville Corp.S.D. New York· 1984-01-23· cited 94×
- In Re Wally Findlay Galleries (New York), Inc.S.D. New York· 1984-02-10· cited 56×
- In Re Johns-Manville Corp.S.D. New York· 1984-03-30· cited 52×
- John v. PaullinSupreme Court· 1913-12-22· cited 48×
- In Re Alton Telegraph Printing Co.S.D. Illinois· 1981-10-01· cited 38×
- Williams Et Al. v. ShafferSupreme Court· 1967-01-23· cited 20×
- Ex Parte AbduSupreme Court· 1918-05-20· cited 19×
- In Re KhanW.D. Kentucky· 1983-11-10· cited 9×
- Sotak v. SotakCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1969-03-07· cited 9×
- In Re Little Creek Development Co.N.D. Texas· 1985-10-31· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.