Sixth Circuit· 1/7/2008
In Re Ferro Corp. Derivative Litigation
Citations
- 511 F.3d 611
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Plaintiffs must first meet the threshold requirement of 60(b)(6)’s extraordinary or exceptional circumstances to vacate the judgment before seeking to conduct discovery”
- “Plaintiffs must frst meet the threshold requirement of 60(b)(6)'s extraordinary or excep- tional circumstances to vacate the judgment before seeking to conduct discovery”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Martin, Batchelder, and Clay, Circuit Judges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Leisure Caviar, LLC v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceSixth Circuit· 2010-08-19· cited 340×
- Andrea Boxill v. James O'GradySixth Circuit· 2019-08-16· cited 263×
- American Civil Liberties Union v. McCreary CountySixth Circuit· 2010-06-09· cited 202×
- Yeschick v. MinetaSixth Circuit· 2012-04-06· cited 170×
- Edward Monroe v. FTS USA, LLCSixth Circuit· 2017-06-21· cited 155×
- Lawrence v. WelchSixth Circuit· 2008-06-03· cited 121×
- Deidre Clark v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 2014-09-04· cited 95×
- Jones v. Illinois Central RailroadSixth Circuit· 2010-08-24· cited 91×
- Martha Vassalle v. Midland Funding LLCSixth Circuit· 2013-02-26· cited 75×
- Samuel Moreland v. Norm RobinsonSixth Circuit· 2016-02-11· cited 65×
- Kenneth Adkins v. Basil WoleverSixth Circuit· 2012-08-29· cited 61×
- Brian Petty v. Metropolitan Gov't of NashvilleSixth Circuit· 2012-07-24· cited 26×
- Lukas Ex Rel. Miller Energy Resources, Inc. v. McPeakSixth Circuit· 2013-09-19· cited 20×
- Dearth v. MukaseySixth Circuit· 2008-02-13· cited 17×
- In Re Keithley Instruments, Inc., Derivative LitigationN.D. Ohio· 2009-01-20· cited 15×
- In Re Keithley Instruments, Inc., Derivative LitigationN.D. Ohio· 2008-03-21· cited 12×
- Gourlay v. Sallie Mae, Inc. (In re Gourlay)Sixth Circuit· 2012-02-21· cited 12×
- In Re ReimanE.D. Michigan· 2010-07-16· cited 10×
- Sagan v. Sumner County Board of EducationSixth Circuit· 2012-10-05· cited 8×
- Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp Derivative Lit v.Third Circuit· 2024-05-03· cited 8×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 1,291×
- Louis David Johnson, Jr. v. Unknown Dellatifa (03-1497/1880) Unknown Carline (03-1506/1865) S. Powers (03-1555/1833) Dave Stasewish (03-1559/1835)Sixth Circuit· 2004-02-03· cited 532×
- Mobley v. McCormickTenth Circuit· 1994-11-14· cited 496×
- Association of Cleveland Fire Fighters v. City of ClevelandSixth Circuit· 2007-09-25· cited 486×
- Sidney Morse v. R. Clayton McWhorterSixth Circuit· 2002-05-20· cited 326×
- Blue Diamond Coal Co. v. Trustees of the Umwa Combined Benefit Fund, (99-6110), Secretary of Health and Human Services, (99-6111)Sixth Circuit· 2001-05-03· cited 277×
- Kottmyer v. MaasSixth Circuit· 2006-01-18· cited 267×
- McCall v. ScottSixth Circuit· 2001-02-13· cited 161×
- Acevedo Villalobos v. Hon. HernandezFirst Circuit· 1994-04-28· cited 106×
- Sanford v. MottsNinth Circuit· 2001-07-31· cited 92×
- Lewis v. GravesSecond Circuit· 1983-02-28· cited 82×
- Mark Schenck v. The City of HudsonSixth Circuit· 1997-08-07· cited 66×
- The Robert N. Clemens Trust v. Morgan Stanley Dw, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 2007-05-02· cited 65×
- Stanley M. Grossman v. Edward C. Johnson, 3rdFirst Circuit· 1982-03-29· cited 56×
- Daubenmire v. City of ColumbusSixth Circuit· 2007-11-06· cited 47×
- Stoner v. WalshS.D. New York· 1991-08-22· cited 39×
- Stepak v. AddisonEleventh Circuit· 1994-04-15· cited 27×
- Davis v. DCB Financial Corp.S.D. Ohio· 2003-03-27· cited 27×
- In re Xcel Energy, Inc.D. Minnesota· 2004-07-12· cited 18×
- In re General Motors Corp. Anti-lock Brake Products Liability LitigationE.D. Missouri· 1997-08-01· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.