Sixth Circuit· 4/6/2012
Yeschick v. Mineta
Citations
- 675 F.3d 622
- 82 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 348
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 6927
- 114 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1202
- 2012 WL 1139062
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[I]t is the party, not the court, who bears the burden of apprising the court of any changes to his or her mailing address.”
- “[I]t is the party, not the court, who bears the burden of apprising the court of any changes to his or her mailing address.”
- “[I]t is the party, not the court, who bears the burden of apprising the court of any changes to his or her mailing address.”
- “[P]arties have an affirmative duty to monitor the dockets to keep apprised of the entry of orders that they may wish to appeal”
- “Regardless of the method of communication utilized (posted mail or email), it is the party, not the court, who bears the burden of apprising the court of any changes to his or her mailing address.” (collecting cases)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Suhrheinrich, Gibbons, McKeague
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.