S.D. Ohio· 3/27/2003
Davis v. DCB Financial Corp.
Citations
- 259 F. Supp. 2d 664
- 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12424
- 2003 WL 1786540
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- claimed damages that are speculative and immeasurable are insufficient to support a good faith claim for the jurisdictional amount
- claimed damages that are speculative and immeasurable are insufficient to support a good faith claim for the jurisdictional amount
- claimed damages that are speculative and immeasurable are insufficient to support a good faith claim for the jurisdictional amount
- claimed damages that are speculative and immeasurable are insufficient to support a good faith claim for the jurisdictional amount
- claimed damages that are speculative and immeasurable are insufficient to support a good faith claim for the jurisdictional amount
- claimed damages that are speculative and immeasurable are insufficient to support a good faith claim for the jurisdictional amount
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Graham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Ferro Corp. Derivative LitigationSixth Circuit· 2008-01-07· cited 118×
- In Re Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2006-07-20· cited 103×
- In Re Keithley Instruments, Inc., Derivative LitigationN.D. Ohio· 2009-01-20· cited 15×
- Albert Fadem Trust v. American Electric Power Co.S.D. Ohio· 2004-09-10· cited 12×
- In Re Keithley Instruments, Inc., Derivative LitigationN.D. Ohio· 2008-03-21· cited 12×
- In Re Regions Morgan Keegan Securities, DerivativeW.D. Tennessee· 2010-03-10· cited 6×
- Henkel v. AschingerCourt of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division· 2012-01-11· cited 6×
- Escue v. Sequent, Inc.S.D. Ohio· 2012-04-25· cited 3×
- In Re Regions Morgan Keegan Sec., Derivative, Erisa Lit.W.D. Tennessee· 2010-09-24· cited 1×
- Auletta v. OrtinoSixth Circuit· 2008-01-07· cited 1×
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court· 1974-04-17· cited 13,385×
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 10,875×
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 1,291×
- Carolyn Morgan v. Church's Fried ChickenSixth Circuit· 1987-09-22· cited 960×
- The Ohio National Life Insurance Company v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 1990-12-20· cited 788×
- Alan Weiner, D.P.M. v. Klais and Company, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1997-02-26· cited 672×
- Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1993-06-18· cited 504×
- Horton v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 466×
- Michael T. Moir v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 268Sixth Circuit· 1990-02-06· cited 461×
- Irwin Klepper v. First American BankFirst Circuit· 1990-10-04· cited 310×
- Carl Thomas Rauch, III v. Day and Night Manufacturing CorporationSixth Circuit· 1978-05-03· cited 227×
- Delman v. City of Cleveland HeightsOhio Supreme Court· 1989-02-02· cited 217×
- Kurtz v. MoffittSupreme Court· 1885-11-23· cited 196×
- Russ v. TRW, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1991-04-24· cited 161×
- McCall v. ScottSixth Circuit· 2001-02-13· cited 161×
- McConnell v. Hunt Sports EnterprisesOhio Court of Appeals· 1999-08-31· cited 124×
- Katherine Amen v. City of Dearborn, a Municipal Corp.Sixth Circuit· 1976-03-24· cited 119×
- Ericsson GE Mobile Communications, Inc. v. Motorola Communications & Electronics, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 1997-08-22· cited 102×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,071 Ann Brown v. Ferro Corp.Sixth Circuit· 1985-06-07· cited 83×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.