In re Envy J.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that MCL 722.27(1) “authorizes the continuing jurisdiction of a circuit court to modify or amend its previous [custody] judgments or orders and is an exception to MCR 7.208(A)”
• holding that “a circuit court has jurisdiction to consider a motion to change the domicile of a minor child established by a custody award in a divorce judgment while that underlying judgment is pending on appeal”
• holding that “a circuit court has jurisdiction to consider a motion to change the domicile of a minor child established by a custody award in a divorce judgment while that underlying judgment is pending on appeal”
• “ ‘When the conduct at issue falls within the scope of both provisions, the specific presumptively governs, whether or not the specific provision also applies to some conduct that falls outside the general.’ ”
• “ ‘When the conduct at issue falls within the scope of both provisions, the specific presumptively governs, whether or not the specific provision also applies to some conduct that falls outside the general.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).