Osborn v. Marr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a parent does not have standing under Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(b) to seek termination of the other parent’s parental rights
• holding mother lacked standing to petition for termination of father’s parental rights where statute allowed only prospective adoptive parent(s
• explaining that a parent of a child is not one of the persons or entities with standing to file a petition to terminate parental rights
• explaining that a parent of a child is not one of the persons or entities with standing to file a petition to terminate parental rights
• holding that pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated § 36-1-113(b
• stating that “[w]hen an appellate court determines that a trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, it must vacate the judgment and dismiss the case without reaching the merits of the appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).