In Re Adoption of A.M.H.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the evidence did not support a finding that the parents “intentionally abandoned” their child
• holding that the evidence did not support a finding that the parents “intentionally abandoned” their child
• holding that the evidence did not support a finding that the parents “intentionally abandoned” their child
• holding that parents‟ failure to visit was not willful when they “actively pursued legal proceedings to regain custody” of their child
• holding that the evidence did not support a finding that the parents “intentionally abandoned” their child
• recognizing that “where the statutory language is not ambiguous . . . the plain and ordinary meaning of the statute must be given effect”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).