In Re Electrolyte Laboratories, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “More dominant features will, of course, weigh heavier in the overall impression of a mark.” (internal citations omitted)
• “More dominant features will, of course, weigh heavier in the overall impression of a mark.”
• “More dominant features will, of course, weigh heavier in the overall impression of a mark.”
• “More dominant features will, of course, weigh heavier in the overall impression of a mark.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Viterra Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2012-03-06· cited 127×
• Quiktrip West, Inc. v. Weigel Stores, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2021-01-07· cited 31×
• Kangol Limited v. Kangaroos U.S.A., Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1992-08-31· cited 19×
• In Re Electrolyte Laboratories, Inc
  Federal Circuit· 1990-09-05· cited 6×
• In Re Van Kampen Merritt Inc
  Federal Circuit· 1995-06-14
• Bliss Collection, LLC v. Latham Companies, LLC
  Sixth Circuit· 2023-09-21
• Jimenez Jason
  Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2025-11-05
• The Heil Co. v. Tripleye GmbH
  Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2024-11-20
• TSI Brands, Inc.
  Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2002-04-30
• Genesco Inc. and Genesco Brands Inc. v. Gregory Martz
  Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2003-03-12
• Nike, Inc. v. WNBA Enterprises, LLC
  Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2007-03-13
• Ginc UK Limited
  Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2007-09-04
• Syndicat Des Proprietaires Viticulteurs De Chateauneuf-Du-Pape v. Etablissements Quinson
  Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2013-06-14
• Information Builders Inc.
  Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2020-04-30
• Mahender Sabhnani v. Mirage Brands, LLC
  Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2021-12-20
• Shenzhen IVPS Technology Co. Ltd. v. Fancy Pants Products, LLC
  Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2022-10-31
• Monster Energy Company v. Critical Role, LLC
  Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2023-11-21
• Look Cycle International v. Kunshan Qiyue Outdoor Sports Goods Co., Ltd.
  Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2024-08-09

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1973-05-03· cited 523×
• In Re National Data Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 1985-01-30· cited 216×
• Giant Food, Inc. v. Nation's Foodservice, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1983-06-30· cited 142×
• Specialty Brands, Inc. v. Coffee Bean Distributors, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1984-11-21· cited 115×
• Kimberly-Clark Corporation v. H. Douglas Enterprises, Ltd.
  Federal Circuit· 1985-10-11· cited 34×
• Massey Junior College, Inc. v. Fashion Institute of Technology
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1974-03-21· cited 34×
• Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Great Plains Bag Co.
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1980-01-24· cited 23×
• Spice Islands, Inc. v. Frank Tea & Spice Co.
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1974-11-27· cited 17×
• Application of Burndy Corporation
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1962-04-11· cited 14×

Other cases named In Re Electrolyte Laboratories, Inc.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• In Re Electrolyte Laboratories, Inc
  Federal Circuit· 1990-09-05· cited 6×
• In re Electrolyte Laboratories, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1990-09-05