Kimberly-Clark Corporation v. H. Douglas Enterprises, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that trade dress associated with the mark of the opposed registration was irrelevant in distinguishing the mark because “such dress might well be changed at any time; only the word mark itself is to be registered”
• HUGGIES found to be a famous mark for diapers: over $300 million in sales over 9 years, $15 million in advertising in one year
• HUGGIES found to be a famous mark for diapers: over $300 million in sales over 9 years, $15 million in advertising in one year
• HUGGIES for disposable diapers and DOUGIES for combination training pants and disposable diapers
• products displayed in same section of store
• \It is settled ... that a distinction in trade dress cannot weigh against likelihood of confusion with respect to the registration of a simple word mark ... [because] such dress might well be changed at any time; only the word mark itself is to be registered.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).