Skip to main content
· 8/31/1992

Kangol Limited v. Kangaroos U.S.A., Inc.

Citations

  • 974 F.2d 161
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 13151
  • 23 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1945
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 20506
  • 1992 WL 207848

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Yet, in neither the applicant’s application nor the opposer’s registrations are the trade channels in any way restricted.”
  • “What is important is not whether people will necessarily confuse the marks, but whether the marks will be likely to confuse people into believing that the goods they are purchasing emanate from the same source.”
  • “What is important is not whether people will necessarily confuse the marks, but whether the marks will be likely to confuse people into believing that the goods they are purchasing emanate from the same source.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rich, Newman, Rader

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.