District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1/11/1991
In Re Ingram
Citations
- 584 A.2d 602
- 1991 D.C. App. LEXIS 7
- 1991 WL 1631
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no misappropriation where lawyer's bank account fell below $ 1,000, the amount he was required to hold for his client, but where the client's money was kept in the client file and not deposited into that account
- no misappropriation because entrusted funds, though not deposited in trust account, were \kept ... intact in the client's file\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Terry, Farrell, Mack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re PiersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-02-28· cited 63×
- In Re BerrymanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-12-28· cited 51×
- In Re SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-02-27· cited 40×
- In Re ManceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-10-29· cited 32×
- In Re HaarDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-07-17· cited 24×
- In Re RossDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-05-18· cited 21×
- In Re EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-10-03· cited 15×
- In Re ArnejaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-01-31· cited 15×
- In Re ClarkeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-11-07· cited 11×
- In Re CloudDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-12-28· cited 10×
- Matter of McGannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-10-23· cited 8×
- In Re MillsteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-12-07· cited 8×
- In Re OsborneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-07-02· cited 3×
- In re Brandi S. NaveDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-03-08· cited 1×
- In re KeilpDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-01-07
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named In Re Ingram
16 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- In Re IngramCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1978-01-03· cited 11×
- In Re IngramSixth Circuit· 2011-12-16· cited 8×
- In Re IngramSupreme Court of Alabama· 1978-02-24· cited 7×
- In re IngramCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2019-06-05· cited 6×
- In re IngramE.D. Wisconsin· 2014-03-27· cited 4×
- In re IngramD. South Carolina· 2015-05-14· cited 3×
- In Re IngramSixth Circuit· 2010-01-28· cited 1×
- In Re IngramE.D. Virginia· 1979-09-05
- In re IngramDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-07-05
- In re IngramCalifornia Superior Court, San Francisco County· 1884-12-01
- In re IngramSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2018-01-08
- In re IngramSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2018-03-01
- In re IngramSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2018-03-01
- In re IngramFourth Circuit· 2004-09-24
- In re IngramFourth Circuit· 2004-09-23
- In re IngramS.D. Ohio· 1991-06-14
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.