Skip to main content

Citations

  • 584 A.2d 602
  • 1991 D.C. App. LEXIS 7
  • 1991 WL 1631

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no misappropriation where lawyer's bank account fell below $ 1,000, the amount he was required to hold for his client, but where the client's money was kept in the client file and not deposited into that account
  • no misappropriation because entrusted funds, though not deposited in trust account, were \kept ... intact in the client's file\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Terry, Farrell, Mack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named In Re Ingram

16 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.