District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 12/30/1992
In Re Choroszej
Citations
- 624 A.2d 434
- 1992 D.C. App. LEXIS 343
- 1992 WL 387488
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- respondent was \insensitive to his fiduciary responsibilities” and engaged in \sloppy bookkeeping”
- respondent was \insensitive to his fiduciary responsibilities\ and engaged in \sloppy book-keeping\
- six-month suspension for negligent misappropriation with numerous mitigating factors
- six-month suspension for negligent misappropriation with numerous mitigating factors
- Board found that attorney representing client in claim for personal injury “genuinely believed that he had paid [a doctor],” had not done so but paid the doctor upon discovery of error; Board concluded that attorney’s conduct was inadvertent and negligent
- Board found that attorney representing client in claim for personal injury “genuinely believed that he had paid [a doctor],” had not done so but paid the doctor upon discovery of error; Board, concluded that attorney’s conduct was inadvertent and negligent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Terry, Wagner, Newman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-08-02· cited 90×
- In Re PiersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-02-28· cited 63×
- In Re BerrymanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-12-28· cited 51×
- In Re BaileyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-09-15· cited 43×
- In Re RayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-05-09· cited 36×
- In Re PelsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-01-30· cited 35×
- In Re CarlsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-07-03· cited 27×
- In Re HaarDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-07-17· cited 24×
- In Re ReedDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-07-11· cited 18×
- In Re ChangDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-05-22· cited 17×
- In Re EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-10-03· cited 15×
- In Re DavenportDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-03-28· cited 14×
- In Re PowellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-08-25· cited 12×
- In Re ClarkeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-11-07· cited 11×
- In Re CloudDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-12-28· cited 10×
- In re Catherine E. AbbeyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2017-09-21· cited 9×
- In Re RivlinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-08-05· cited 5×
- In Re MarlowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-01-26· cited 4×
- In Re ClowerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-09-18· cited 2×
- In re: Catherine E. AbbeyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2017-10-19
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1979-12-19· cited 416×
- In Re HarrisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-05-26· cited 82×
- In Re HesslerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-10-27· cited 61×
- In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-09-19· cited 37×
- Hamilton v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court· 1979-03-28· cited 36×
- In Re EvansDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-07-24· cited 32×
- Black v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court· 1962-01-16· cited 32×
- Arm v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court· 1990-05-03· cited 18×
- State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Kansas· 1971-04-10· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.