In re D.J.
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 2573
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in granting the motion of Franklin County Children's Services for permanent custody and the decision was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Appellant did not have standing to address issues relating to a non-appealing party, and competent, credible evidence supported the juvenile court's finding that granting permanent custody was in the child's best interest. The judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Branch, is affirmed.
Judges: Leland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- In re T.P.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-01-11· cited 62×
- State ex rel. Gabriel v. City of YoungstownOhio Supreme Court· 1996-06-19· cited 35×
- In re C.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-03-31· cited 20×
- In re A.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-03-14· cited 17×
- In re J.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-16· cited 12×
- In re X.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-16· cited 5×
- In re S.Y.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-09-13· cited 4×
- In re U.G.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-11-02· cited 3×
- In re M.A.P.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-24· cited 2×
- In re J.P.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-10-10· cited 2×
- In re D.K.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-03-20· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.