In re U.G.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing dismissal of ADA claims based on failure to exhaust because the 20 plaintiff’s unverified charge was a “mere technical defect . . . not fatal to his suit” and “he 21 must be provided with the opportunity to amend his charge”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).