Skip to main content
· 3/16/2022

In re X.H.

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 779

Syllabus

lack of service – standing – actual prejudice – permanent custody – manifest weight of the evidence – best interest of the children – alternative motions – legal custody – six-month extension of temporary custody

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “even structural error is subject to the doctrine of waiver”
  • party may not raise ground on appeal that was not raised before motion judge
  • where theory on which defendant relied was foreshadowed by earlier case law, G. L. c. 278, § 33E, precluded further review because issue should have been raised at trial or on direct appeal
  • “[E]ven structural error is subject to the doctrine of waiver”
  • error in reasonable doubt instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.