In re A.M.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• mother’s argument that she may have been able to retain residual parental rights if the child had been placed with non-appealing father was based on speculation only

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re R.D.
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-10-25· cited 13×
• In re T.B.
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-09-17· cited 10×
• In re L.W.
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-18· cited 8×
• In re S.W.
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-28· cited 8×
• In re D.D.
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-01· cited 5×
• In re X.H.
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-16· cited 5×
• Orion Mgt., Inc. v. Kaeka
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-03-26· cited 5×
• In re U.G.
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-11-02· cited 3×
• In re W.R.
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-06· cited 3×
• In re A.C.
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-21· cited 2×
• In re G.C.J.
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-22· cited 2×
• In re M.A.P.
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-24· cited 2×
• In re D.J.
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-07-22· cited 2×
• In re B.B.
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-18· cited 1×
• In re J.S.
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-30· cited 1×