· 12/13/2000
In Re Digex, Inc. Shareholders Litigation
Citations
- 789 A.2d 1176
- 2000 Del. Ch. LEXIS 171
- 2000 WL 33671760
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- framing Thorpe as a decision under the “interest or expectancy” prong of the corporate opportunity doctrine test
- “A claim that a director or officer improperly usurped a corporate opportunity belonging to the corporation is a derivative claim.”
- “I am opposed to having any part of my equity aligned with the capital contribution based on the value of [Robison Energy].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chandler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.