Skip to main content
· 12/13/2000

In Re Digex, Inc. Shareholders Litigation

Citations

  • 789 A.2d 1176
  • 2000 Del. Ch. LEXIS 171
  • 2000 WL 33671760

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • framing Thorpe as a decision under the “interest or expectancy” prong of the corporate opportunity doctrine test
  • “A claim that a director or officer improperly usurped a corporate opportunity belonging to the corporation is a derivative claim.”
  • “I am opposed to having any part of my equity aligned with the capital contribution based on the value of [Robison Energy].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chandler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.