SHOMA CORAL GABLES, LLC, etc. v. GABLES INVESTMENT HOLDINGS, LLC, etc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that even though sign ordinance was repealed, constitutional challenge was not moot because plaintiff requested damages
• concluding that plaintiff had standing to challenge provision of ordinance under which it had suffered harm
• concluding that constitutional challenge to sign ordinance was not moot even though ordinance was repealed because plaintiff requested damages
• recognizing that “[b]ecause Granite State has requested damages ... the changes made to the ordinance do not make this case moot.”
• holding plaintiff only had standing to challenge the constitutionality of the portion of the ordinance under which its billboard permits were denied
• observing that in an as-applied challenge, a plaintiff “has standing to challenge the constitutionality of only” the provisions of a municipal permit regulation that were applied to the plaintiff’s application

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).