In Re Frank N. Piasecki and Donald N. Meyers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that rebuttal expert reports must include “a showing of facts supporting the 17 opposite conclusion”
• stating that rebuttal expert reports must include “a showing of facts supporting the 6 opposite conclusion”
• finding nonobviousness where the evi- dence demonstrated a failure of others to provide a feasi- ble solution to a longstanding problem
• prima facie obviousness is but a legal inference drawn from uncontradicted evidence
• prima facie obviousness is but a legal inference drawn from uncontradicted evidence
• \The concept of prima facie obviousness in ex parte patent examination is but a procedural mechanism to allocate in an orderly way the burdens of going forward and of persuasion as between the examiner and the applicant.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).