In re D.E.M.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding principal and assistant principal were acting as school officials, not police agents, when they questioned student regarding rumor he had brought gun to school, where: (1) purpose of search was primarily to ensure the students’ safety; (2
• holding principal and assistant principal were acting as school officials, not police agents, when they questioned student regarding rumor he had brought gun to school, where: (1) purpose of search was primarily to ensure the students' safety; (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Commonwealth v. Beasley
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-10-23· cited 119×
• People v. Randy G.
  California Supreme Court· 2001-08-13· cited 51×
• Commonwealth v. Dales
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-03-25· cited 39×
• Commonwealth v. Maxon
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-05-07· cited 29×
• In re V.P.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2001-05-31· cited 29×
• In the Interest of R.H.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-02-21· cited 28×
• T.S. v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-03-27· cited 18×
• In the Interest of Doe
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2004-06-02· cited 5×
• People v. K.S.
  California Court of Appeal· 2010-03-25· cited 4×
• Haas v. West Shore School District
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-01-29· cited 3×
• In Re RH
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-02-21· cited 1×
• In the Interest of A.D.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-02-19· cited 1×
• In re J.N.Y.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-07-31· cited 1×
• In Re DEM
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-03-18
• In Re AD
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-02-19
• TS v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-03-27
• In Re KS
  California Court of Appeal· 2010-03-25
• In Re VP
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2001-05-31
• in the Matter of v. P.
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2001-05-31
• Commonwealth v. Huff
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-09-22

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• Katz v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
• Coolidge v. New Hampshire
  Supreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
• Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco
  Supreme Court· 1967-06-05· cited 3,591×
• Goss v. Lopez
  Supreme Court· 1975-01-22· cited 3,014×
• Ingraham v. Wright
  Supreme Court· 1977-04-19· cited 2,975×
• Elkins v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1960-06-27· cited 2,501×
• New Jersey v. T. L. O.
  Supreme Court· 1985-01-15· cited 2,391×
• Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Botsford
  Supreme Court· 1891-05-25· cited 688×
• Commonwealth v. Dugger
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-01-09· cited 417×
• Commonwealth v. Nester
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-03-25· cited 199×
• Commonwealth v. Jackson
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-07-23· cited 177×
• People v. Dilworth
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1996-01-18· cited 131×
• John S. Pleasant v. Larry Lovell, Larry Hyatt, Vernon Pixley, Kenneth Batson and Tim Fortune
  Tenth Circuit· 1989-06-06· cited 112×
• Commonwealth v. Hawkins
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-04-22· cited 89×
• Commonwealth v. Corley
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-04-23· cited 70×
• State v. McKinnon
  Washington Supreme Court· 1977-01-07· cited 61×
• Commonwealth v. Cass
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-01-07· cited 56×
• United States v. Smythe
  Tenth Circuit· 1996-05-17· cited 52×