Indiana Court of Appeals· 3/27/2007

T.S. v. State

Citations

863 N.E.2d 362
2007 Ind. App. LEXIS 572

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that the school liaison officer was employed by the Indianapolis Public School Police
noting that the school liaison officer was employed by the Indianapolis Public School Police
determining that an officer's removal of a student from class and questioning the student as to whether he had drugs did not violate the Fourth Amendment because the officer had received an anonymous tip that the student had drugs on his person that day
determining that an officer’s removal of a student from class and questioning the student as to whether he had drugs did not violate the Fourth Amendment because the officer had received an anonymous tip that the student had drugs on his person that day
“[T]he decisions of Indiana courts subsequent to T.L.O . indicate that the exclusionary rule is the remedy for Fourth Amendm ent violations occurring in schools.”
“Significant authority exists for the proposition that a security or school officer who compels or restrains a student’s movement seizes the student for Fourth Amendment purposes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Darden, Robb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.