Second Circuit· 10/7/2019
In re del Valle Ruiz
Citations
- 939 F.3d 520
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “§ 1782’s ‘resides or is found’ language extends to the limits of personal jurisdiction consistent with due process”
- reasoning that courts consistently give “broad interpretations to similar ‘found’ language in other statutes” and that Congress intended section 1782 to be interpreted broadly
- finding that the “statutory scope” of the first mandatory factor “extends to the limits of personal jurisdiction consistent with due process” and thus encompasses both general and specific jurisdiction
- noting that “tag” jurisdiction “comport[s] with due process” in the course of analyzing the jurisdictional reach of 28 U.S.C. § 1782 and citing In re Edelman, 295 F.3d at 179
- discussing In Sergeeva v. Tripleton Int’l Ltd., 834 F.3d 1194 (11th Cir. 2016)
- directing courts to consider the location of documents
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Banca Pueyo SA v. Lone Star Fund IX (US), LFifth Circuit· 2020-10-27· cited 8×
- Eli Lilly and Company v. Novartis Pharma AGFourth Circuit· 2022-06-16· cited 5×
- In the Matter of Application of Eleanor De Leon v. Northridge Capital, LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2020-03-04
- Attorney General of the British Virgin IslandsDistrict of Columbia· 2020-05-23
- In Re: Bapa Holdings, Corp.District of Columbia· 2025-11-24
- In Re: Bapa Holdings, Corp.District of Columbia· 2026-01-15
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 12,253×
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court· 1984-04-24· cited 6,200×
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court· 2014-01-14· cited 4,713×
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court· 2011-06-27· cited 4,319×
- Walden v. FioreSupreme Court· 2014-02-25· cited 3,814×
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court· 2017-06-19· cited 2,355×
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court· 1958-06-16· cited 1,195×
- Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of MarinSupreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 683×
- Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.Supreme Court· 2013-04-17· cited 438×
- Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Supreme Court· 2004-06-21· cited 433×
- RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Cmty.Supreme Court· 2016-06-20· cited 285×
- SPV Osus Ltd. v. UBS AGSecond Circuit· 2018-02-09· cited 285×
- Gucci America, Inc. v. Bank of ChinaSecond Circuit· 2014-09-17· cited 259×
- Sokolow v. Palestine Liberation OrganizationSecond Circuit· 2016-08-31· cited 206×
- In re PicardSecond Circuit· 2019-02-25· cited 154×
- Patricia Chew, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Daren Chew, Deceased and William Chew v. Bent DietrichSecond Circuit· 1998-04-01· cited 123×
- Green v. City of New YorkSecond Circuit· 2006-10-05· cited 115×
- Enforce Administrative Subpoenas Duces Tecum of the Securities & Exchange Commission v. KnowlesTenth Circuit· 1996-06-20· cited 99×
- First American Corp. v. Price Waterhouse LLPSecond Circuit· 1998-07-14· cited 73×
Other cases named In re del Valle Ruiz
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.