N.D. Illinois· 12/16/2010
In Re Davis
Citations
- 439 B.R. 863
- 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 4998
- 2010 WL 5136037
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- collecting cases and stating that the majority rule is that the projected disposable income test does not apply to modification
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eugene R. Wedoff
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re GrutschD. Kansas· 2011-06-29· cited 17×
- In re CampbellD. New Mexico· 2013-09-20· cited 16×
- In Re HeidekerM.D. Florida· 2011-06-02· cited 11×
- In re McAllisterN.D. Georgia· 2014-04-03· cited 10×
- In re SwainE.D. Virginia· 2014-04-01· cited 6×
- In re CormierD. Massachusetts· 2012-09-27· cited 5×
- In re TibbsS.D. Florida· 2012-09-04· cited 5×
- In re MartinC.D. Illinois· 2012-01-24· cited 4×
- In re PeeblesS.D. Georgia· 2013-09-26· cited 4×
- In re PowersC.D. Illinois· 2014-03-28· cited 3×
- In re VelaW.D. Michigan· 2015-03-13· cited 2×
- In re BarnesE.D. Wisconsin· 2014-03-17
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,657×
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court· 2004-01-26· cited 1,956×
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court· 2001-11-13· cited 1,407×
- Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court· 2000-05-30· cited 1,290×
- Hamilton v. LanningSupreme Court· 2010-06-07· cited 365×
- In the Matter of Kenneth W. Smith, Debtor. Appeal of State of IndianaSeventh Circuit· 1988-06-09· cited 176×
- In Re SlusherD. Nevada· 2007-01-17· cited 119×
- Forbes v. Forbes (In Re Forbes)Eighth Circuit· 1997-12-09· cited 105×
- Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co. v. Kull (In Re Kull)S.D. Georgia· 1981-07-16· cited 83×
- Sunahara v. Burchard (In Re Sunahara)Ninth Circuit· 2005-06-27· cited 75×
- Fridley v. Forsythe (In Re Fridley)Ninth Circuit· 2007-12-18· cited 43×
- Wachovia Dealer Services v. Jones (In Re Jones)Tenth Circuit· 2008-07-07· cited 38×
- Storey v. Pees (In Re Storey)Sixth Circuit· 2008-08-07· cited 31×
- In Re EwersD. Nevada· 2007-02-26· cited 21×
- In Re KingS.D. Illinois· 2010-10-20· cited 20×
- In Re PolakW.D. Michigan· 1981-02-27· cited 17×
- In Re TraceyD. Maryland· 1986-10-17· cited 16×
- In Re HillS.D. Ohio· 2008-04-29· cited 15×
- In Re BrauneN.D. Texas· 2008-04-02· cited 14×
- In Re KiddD. Kansas· 2007-08-27· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.