In re Swain

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The weight of authority is that § 1325(b) does not apply to § 1329 plan modifications.\
• an increase in the debtors combined monthly income of nearly 50% was substantial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Moore
  E.D. Tennessee· 2019-04-25· cited 4×
• In re Matusak
  E.D. North Carolina· 2017-05-17· cited 1×

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hamilton v. Lanning
  Supreme Court· 2010-06-07· cited 365×
• In Re Francis A. Arnold, A/K/A Frank Arnold, Debtor. Francis A. Arnold, A/K/A Frank Arnold v. Ruth Weast
  Fourth Circuit· 1989-03-06· cited 139×
• Robert Ranta v. Thomas Gorman
  Fourth Circuit· 2013-07-01· cited 104×
• Sunahara v. Burchard (In Re Sunahara)
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-06-27· cited 75×
• Whaley v. Tennyson (In Re Tennyson)
  Eleventh Circuit· 2010-07-16· cited 65×
• Unnamed case
  Fourth Circuit· 2007-01-18· cited 37×
• In Re Butler
  M.D. North Carolina· 1994-07-13· cited 24×
• In Re Ewers
  D. Nevada· 2007-02-26· cited 21×
• In Re King
  S.D. Illinois· 2010-10-20· cited 20×
• In Re Hill
  S.D. Ohio· 2008-04-29· cited 15×
• In Re Davis
  N.D. Illinois· 2010-12-16· cited 15×
• In Re Young
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2007-07-02· cited 14×
• In Re McCully
  N.D. Ohio· 2008-12-19· cited 11×
• In Re Heideker
  M.D. Florida· 2011-06-02· cited 11×
• In Re Kearney
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2010-12-03· cited 10×
• In Re Crim
  M.D. Tennessee· 2011-03-14· cited 6×